Popular Articles

Blogs Comment On Supreme Court Decisions, Obama Administration, Other Topics
The following summarizes selected women"s health-related blog entries. ~ "Just Released: Gains and Losses for Women in 2008-09 Supreme Court Decisions," National Women"s Law Center"s "Womenstake": The Supreme Court"s 2008-2009 term, which concluded Monday, included "several crucial decisions that demonstrate the impact of the court on women"s lives," according to the blog post, which summarizes a new analysis from NWLC on the cases. For example, the blog post says that the rulings in Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee and Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tenn., increased employees" protections against discrimination in the workplace. However, the rulings in Ricci v. DeStetano -- which overturned an appellate court"s anti-discrimination ruling -- and AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen -- which "permitted AT&T to pay women lower pension benefits for the rest of their lives" -- were "not as positive," the blog entry says. NWLC Co-President Marcia Greenberger said that the Supreme Court "ignored the realities of the workplace and the intent of Congress and ruled against female workers" in AT&T v. Hulteen. Greenberger also said that such cases "underscore why every seat on the Supreme Court is of paramount importance to women," adding that it is "absolutely critical" that Supreme Court nominees have "a strong commitment to upholding and enforcing women"s basic legal rights and protections" ("Womenstake," National Women"s Law Center, 6/29).~ "Waldman and Saletan: Oh What a Fine Bromance!" Jodi Jacobson, RH Reality Check: In a recent bloggingheads.tv chat on "common ground" in the abortion-rights debate, Slate columnist Will Saletan and Beliefnet Editor-in-Chief Steve Waldman "spent as much time as possible complimenting each other"s work" and "as little as possible on any real substance regarding reproductive health and choice issues," Jacobson writes. It is "clear that the Obama administration"s stated intention to create "a common ground platform"" on abortion rights has become "a full employment program for both Waldman and Saletan," she writes. Jacobson continues, "So perhaps the most striking thing about the conversation was that, in the end, they both effectively concluded that the common ground enterprise was a "just for show" political strategy," and that the "real strategies" necessary to reduce the need for abortion "are the very prevention programs least likely to be supported by the far right. (Revelation!)." She adds, "However, they came to this conclusion through the same faux-expert uninformed arguments that characterize their columns." During the "Will-interviews-Steve format," Saletan "revealed once again that there is no core philosophy or framework underlying his ever-shifting positions on choice and abortion," according to Jacobson. She adds that "Waldman, for his part, several times underscored what is clear from reading his work": that he "just throws things "out there" without considered thought" about what "might be good versus bad data, not understanding how to read evidence," and "oblivious or uncaring about the effects his free-form moralistic misinformation and opinions might actually have on an already polarized debate." According to Jacobson, "Public policies affecting sexual and reproductive health issues" should be "based first and foremost on public health and on promoting individual rights balanced by individual responsibilities," but "as anyone living on Planet Earth knows, sex and reproduction have become the front in a war waged by ultra-conservative religious and political forces for which Waldman serves as a paid flacky." She continues, "In fact, Waldman himself stated during the program: "I have a corporate interest in injecting religion into every debate."" Jacobson states, "Reading and watching this duo is like buying the OK! magazine version of the culture wars at the grocery store; they put whatever sells on the front cover, no matter the truth or consequences.
new payday loan lenders
AMS 700(R) With INHIBIZONE(R) Approved By FDA As The Only Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Proven To Reduce Infection
American Medical Systems, Inc. (AMS) (NASDAQ: AMMD) a trusted provider of medical solutions for restoring men"s and women"s pelvic health, announced that its AMS 700® with INHIBIZONE® has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as the only inflatable penile prosthesis with clinical evidence showing a significant reduction in the rate of revision surgery due to infection.
News of the day
Discovery Of Molecular Cause Of Alzheimer's Disease Could Bring Early Diagnosis, Treatment Closer
A discovery made by researchers at McGill University and the affiliated Lady Davis Research Institute for Medical Research at Montreal"s Jewish General Hospital offers new hope for the early diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer"s disease.
Endocrinology

RDAA Survey Shows Widespread Support For Medicare Loading For Rural And Remote Doctors

Over 80% of rural and remote doctors recently surveyed by the Rural Doctors Association of Australia (RDAA) believe adding a significant rural and remote loading on Medicare items would assist in recruiting and retaining doctors in their communities. The online poll conducted by RDAA during April and May backs RDAA"s ongoing call for an extra loading to be added to Medicare fees paid to rural and remote doctors. RDAA President Dr Nola Maxfield said the poll showed rural Australia needed "better incentives that demonstrate to doctors currently working in the bush they are valued, and shows those considering a move to the bush that it is an attractive option". "We have to do something significant, and urgently, to turn around the declining number of doctors in the bush," Dr Maxfield said. "Incentives would be calculated as a loading on rural doctors" Medicare billings or as a special payment for salaried rural doctors. The loading would increase the more remote the location the doctors worked in. "The Federal Government must look seriously at building a rural loading into Medicare." The RDAA survey paints a clear picture of the existing rural medical workforce crisis and the significant concerns over the sustainability of the workforce. When asked if their rural town or community had enough doctors to service the health and medical needs of its residents nearly 60% of respondents described their towns as "underserviced" and 9% said they were "severely underserviced". One respondent drolly remarked, "clone the doctors!" A considerable number of the rural and remote medical workforce polled reported overwhelming on-call demands, with 17% on call seven days a week. Nearly 30% of the workforce was on-call at least one day a week. The average weekly hours worked by the doctors surveyed, was a staggering 47.4 hours. This compares with the national weekly hours worked of 34.7 hours. Much of the feedback received as part of the survey reflected these views, with comments such as this one common, "...until rural and remote work is reclassified as a specialty nothing will change." Along with calling for a rural loading on Medicare items as a remedy for the current workforce shortage, the survey found doctors want a range of other supports, including improved after-hours and on-call arrangements, better education and professional supports, better locum availability, capital funding to improve practice infrastructure and nearly 100% of respondents reported family friendly working arrangements as important or very important. Feedback provided as part of the survey also reflects frustrations with health and hospital administration, with comments such as this: "...sack the bureaucrats and replace them with clinicians who understand healthcare delivery ..." and this: "...anaesthetists should run hospitals, plan theatres - not accountants or business men who do not actually work in health care." The comments also reflect dissatisfaction at the loss of rural health facilities, in comments like this "...replace lost maternity service." Rural Doctors Association of Australia


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):